« Previous post | Main | Next post »

05.08 | Oh yes.

"We've got a big Die Hard-style spectacle planned in the back of our minds."
That's Kiefer Sutherland speaking about the possibility of a '24' movie. Bring it on, that's all I can say. It's Kiefer's use of the definite article (when talking about 'the movie') that makes me think that this is more than a rumour.

I don't know how you'd squish 24 hours of real time into a feature-length 90 minutes or so, but I'd like to see them try. Anyone got any thoughts?

Related Entries:

‘24’ producers deny Edward Norton rumours - Mar 18, 2006
More rumours that '24' will be filming in London.... again. - Mar 04, 2006
Exclusive photos from the '24' set - Feb 27, 2006
The Jack Bauer Kill Count - Feb 27, 2006

Comments:

My guess would be that the film would be more '120' (minutes) than 24 hours. The problem is that films done in real time have happened before, as have films using split screens...

Posted by: Nick at May 8, 2003 04:05 AM | #

Post a comment:

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry: inappropriate or purely promotional comments may be removed. To create a live link simply type the URL, including the <http://>, and it will be made into a live link for you. You can put up to four URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted - there's no need to use <p> or <br> tags.




Remember Me?


Main navigation:

Enter your email to subscribe:

Feeds:

Subscribe with My Yahoo! Subscribe with MY MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe with Feedster
Subscribe with Newsgator Subscribe to the index.xml feed

News Now